module openconfig-routing-policy { yang-version "1"; // namespace namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/routing-policy"; prefix "rpol"; // import some basic types import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; } import openconfig-policy-types { prefix pt; } import openconfig-extensions { prefix oc-ext; } // meta organization "OpenConfig working group"; contact "OpenConfig working group netopenconfig@googlegroups.com"; description "This module describes a YANG model for routing policy configuration. It is a limited subset of all of the policy configuration parameters available in the variety of vendor implementations, but supports widely used constructs for managing how routes are imported, exported, and modified across different routing protocols. This module is intended to be used in conjunction with routing protocol configuration models (e.g., BGP) defined in other modules. Route policy expression: Policies are expressed as a set of top-level policy definitions, each of which consists of a sequence of policy statements. Policy statements consist of simple condition-action tuples. Conditions may include mutiple match or comparison operations, and similarly actions may be multitude of changes to route attributes or a final disposition of accepting or rejecting the route. Route policy evaluation: Policy definitions are referenced in routing protocol configurations using import and export configuration statements. The arguments are members of an ordered list of named policy definitions which comprise a policy chain, and optionally, an explicit default policy action (i.e., reject or accept). Evaluation of each policy definition proceeds by evaluating its corresponding individual policy statements in order. When a condition statement in a policy statement is satisfied, the corresponding action statement is executed. If the action statement has either accept-route or reject-route actions, policy evaluation of the current policy definition stops, and no further policy definitions in the chain are evaluated. If the condition is not satisfied, then evaluation proceeds to the next policy statement. If none of the policy statement conditions are satisfied, then evaluation of the current policy definition stops, and the next policy definition in the chain is evaluated. When the end of the policy chain is reached, the default route disposition action is performed (i.e., reject-route unless an an alternate default action is specified for the chain). Policy 'subroutines' (or nested policies) are supported by allowing policy statement conditions to reference another policy definition which applies conditions and actions from the referenced policy before returning to the calling policy statement and resuming evaluation. If the called policy results in an accept-route (either explicit or by default), then the subroutine returns an effective true value to the calling policy. Similarly, a reject-route action returns false. If the subroutine returns true, the calling policy continues to evaluate the remaining conditions (using a modified route if the subroutine performed any changes to the route)."; oc-ext:openconfig-version "1.1.0"; revision "2015-10-09" { description "Initial OpenConfig public release"; reference "1.1.0"; } revision "2015-05-15" { description "Initial revision"; reference "Pre-release"; } // typedef statements typedef default-policy-type { type enumeration { enum ACCEPT-ROUTE { description "default policy to accept the route"; } enum REJECT-ROUTE { description "default policy to reject the route"; } } description "type used to specify default route disposition in a policy chain"; } // grouping statements grouping prefix-set { description "Data definition for a list of IPv4 or IPv6 prefixes which are matched as part of a policy"; list prefix-set { key prefix-set-name; description "List of the defined prefix sets"; leaf prefix-set-name { type string; description "name / label of the prefix set -- this is used to reference the set in match conditions"; } list prefix { key "ip-prefix masklength-range"; description "List of prefix expressions that are part of the set"; leaf ip-prefix { type inet:ip-prefix; mandatory true; description "The prefix member in CIDR notation -- while the prefix may be either IPv4 or IPv6, most implementations require all members of the prefix set to be the same address family. Mixing address types in the same prefix set is likely to cause an error."; } leaf masklength-range { type string { pattern '([0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+)|exact'; } description "Defines a range for the masklength, or 'exact' if the prefix has an exact length. Example: 10.3.192.0/21 through 10.3.192.0/24 would be expressed as prefix: 10.3.192.0/21, masklength-range: 21..24. Example: 10.3.192.0/21 would be expressed as prefix: 10.3.192.0/21, masklength-range: exact"; } } } } grouping neighbor-set { description "Data definition for a list of IPv4 or IPv6 neighbors which can be matched in a routing policy"; list neighbor-set { key neighbor-set-name; description "Definitions for neighbor sets"; leaf neighbor-set-name { type string; description "name / label of the neighbor set -- this is used to reference the set in match conditions"; } list neighbor { key "address"; description "list of addresses that are part of the neighbor set"; leaf address { type inet:ip-address; description "IP address of the neighbor set member"; } } } } grouping tag-set { description "Data definitions for a list of tags which can be matched in policies"; list tag-set { key tag-set-name; description "Definitions for tag sets"; leaf tag-set-name { type string; description "name / label of the tag set -- this is used to reference the set in match conditions"; } list tag { key "value"; description "list of tags that are part of the tag set"; leaf value { type pt:tag-type; description "Value of the tag set member"; } } } } grouping generic-defined-sets { description "Data definitions for pre-defined sets of attributes used in policy match conditions. These sets are generic and can be used in matching conditions in different routing protocols."; container prefix-sets { description "Enclosing container for defined prefix sets for matching"; uses prefix-set; } container neighbor-sets { description "Enclosing container for defined neighbor sets for matching"; uses neighbor-set; } container tag-sets { description "Enclosing container for defined tag sets for matching"; uses tag-set; } } grouping local-generic-conditions { description "Condition statement definitions for consideration of a local characteristic of a route"; leaf install-protocol-eq { type identityref { base pt:install-protocol-type; } description "Condition to check the protocol / method used to install which installed the route into the local routing table"; } } grouping match-set-options-group { description "Grouping containing options relating to how a particular set should be matched"; leaf match-set-options { type pt:match-set-options-type; description "Optional parameter that governs the behaviour of the match operation"; } } grouping match-set-options-restricted-group { description "Grouping for a restricted set of match operation modifiers"; leaf match-set-options { type pt:match-set-options-restricted-type; description "Optional parameter that governs the behaviour of the match operation. This leaf only supports matching on ANY member of the set or inverting the match. Matching on ALL is not supported)"; } } grouping generic-conditions { description "Condition statement definitions for checking membership in a generic defined set"; container match-prefix-set { presence "The presence of this container indicates that the routes should match the prefix-set referenced."; description "Match a referenced prefix-set according to the logic defined in the match-set-options leaf"; leaf prefix-set { type leafref { path "/routing-policy/defined-sets/prefix-sets/" + "prefix-set/prefix-set-name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when it's //supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } description "References a defined prefix set"; } uses match-set-options-restricted-group; } container match-neighbor-set { presence "The presence of this container indicates that the routes should match the neighbour set referenced"; description "Match a referenced neighbor set according to the logic defined in the match-set-options-leaf"; leaf neighbor-set { type leafref { path "/routing-policy/defined-sets/neighbor-sets/" + "neighbor-set/neighbor-set-name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when it's //supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } description "References a defined neighbor set"; } uses match-set-options-restricted-group; } container match-tag-set { presence "The presence of this container indicates that the routes should match the tag-set referenced"; description "Match a referenced tag set according to the logic defined in the match-options-set leaf"; leaf tag-set { type leafref { path "/routing-policy/defined-sets/tag-sets/tag-set" + "/tag-set-name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when it's //supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } description "References a defined tag set"; } uses match-set-options-restricted-group; } uses local-generic-conditions; } grouping igp-generic-conditions { description "grouping for IGP policy conditions"; } grouping igp-conditions { description "grouping for IGP-specific policy conditions"; container igp-conditions { description "Policy conditions for IGP attributes"; uses igp-generic-conditions; } } grouping generic-actions { description "Definitions for common set of policy action statements that manage the disposition or control flow of the policy"; choice route-disposition { description "Select the final disposition for the route, either accept or reject."; leaf accept-route { type empty; description "accepts the route into the routing table"; } leaf reject-route { type empty; description "rejects the route"; } } } grouping igp-actions { description "grouping for IGP-specific policy actions"; container igp-actions { description "Actions to set IGP route attributes; these actions apply to multiple IGPs"; leaf set-tag { type pt:tag-type; description "Set the tag value for OSPF or IS-IS routes."; } } } grouping routing-policy-top { description "Top level container for OpenConfig routing policy"; container routing-policy { description "top-level container for all routing policy configuration"; container defined-sets { description "Predefined sets of attributes used in policy match statements"; uses generic-defined-sets; // uses bgp-defined-sets; // don't see a need for IGP-specific defined sets at this // point e.g., for OSPF, IS-IS, etc. } container policy-definitions { description "Enclosing container for the list of top-level policy definitions"; list policy-definition { key name; description "List of top-level policy definitions, keyed by unique name. These policy definitions are expected to be referenced (by name) in policy chains specified in import or export configuration statements."; leaf name { type string; description "Name of the top-level policy definition -- this name is used in references to the current policy"; } container statements { description "Enclosing container for policy statements"; list statement { key name; // TODO: names of policy statements within a policy // definition should be optional, however, YANG // requires a unique id for lists; not sure that a // compound key works either -- need to investigate // further. ordered-by user; description "Policy statements group conditions and actions within a policy definition. They are evaluated in the order specified (see the description of policy evaluation at the top of this module."; leaf name { type string; description "name of the policy statement"; } container conditions { description "Condition statements for this policy statement"; leaf call-policy { type leafref { path "/rpol:routing-policy/" + "rpol:policy-definitions/" + "rpol:policy-definition/rpol:name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when //it is supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } description "Applies the statements from the specified policy definition and then returns control the current policy statement. Note that the called policy may itself call other policies (subject to implementation limitations). This is intended to provide a policy 'subroutine' capability. The called policy should contain an explicit or a default route disposition that returns an effective true (accept-route) or false (reject-route), otherwise the behavior may be ambiguous and implementation dependent"; } uses generic-conditions; uses igp-conditions; } container actions { description "Action statements for this policy statement"; uses generic-actions; uses igp-actions; } } } } } } } grouping apply-policy-config { description "Configuration data for routing policies"; leaf-list import-policy { type leafref { path "/rpol:routing-policy/rpol:policy-definitions/" + "rpol:policy-definition/rpol:name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when it's //supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } ordered-by user; description "list of policy names in sequence to be applied on receiving a routing update in the current context, e.g., for the current peer group, neighbor, address family, etc."; } leaf default-import-policy { type default-policy-type; default REJECT-ROUTE; description "explicitly set a default policy if no policy definition in the import policy chain is satisfied."; } leaf-list export-policy { type leafref { path "/rpol:routing-policy/rpol:policy-definitions/" + "rpol:policy-definition/rpol:name"; //TODO: require-instance should be added when it's //supported in YANG 1.1 //require-instance true; } ordered-by user; description "list of policy names in sequence to be applied on sending a routing update in the current context, e.g., for the current peer group, neighbor, address family, etc."; } leaf default-export-policy { type default-policy-type; default REJECT-ROUTE; description "explicitly set a default policy if no policy definition in the export policy chain is satisfied."; } } grouping apply-policy-state { description "Operational state associated with routing policy"; //TODO: identify additional state data beyond the intended //policy configuration. } grouping apply-policy-group { description "Top level container for routing policy applications. This grouping is intended to be used in routing models where needed."; container apply-policy { description "Anchor point for routing policies in the model. Import and export policies are with respect to the local routing table, i.e., export (send) and import (receive), depending on the context."; container config { description "Policy configuration data."; uses apply-policy-config; } container state { config false; description "Operational state for routing policy"; uses apply-policy-config; uses apply-policy-state; } } } uses routing-policy-top; }